Funding criteria and policies
The Research Council for Biosciences, Health and the Environment decided the funding criteria and policies for the September 2022 call in its June meeting. These policies supplement the guidelines in the Academy’s September 2022 call texts and the Academy’s criteria for research funding decisions.
Applicants are required to have a close connection to the Finnish scientific community so that the funding will benefit Finnish research and society. This means that the funding will be administered by a Finnish organisation. In addition, the Research Council for Biosciences, Health and the Environment primarily funds projects where both the PI and the research team mainly work in Finland. This must be clearly indicated in the application.
Academy Project funding
Primary funding criteria:
- scientific quality and feasibility of the research plan
- evidence of principal investigator’s scientific work and successful management that is significant in relation to the career stage
The Research Council requires that the leadership and research tasks of the PI be clearly described in the application.
Secondary funding criteria, applied when deciding between applications of equal merit:
- bold initiatives that promote the renewal of science
- impact beyond academia
- international cooperation that supports the research
- supporting researchers who have recently obtained their doctoral degree.
The Research Council’s funding comes to a maximum of 550,000 euros per project.
In the case of consortia, the Research Council pays attention to the added value of the collaboration. The added value must be described in the application. Consortium subprojects are required to be of the same scientific quality as the main applicant, or to contribute significantly to the project implementation. Consortium PIs are granted a maximum of 400,000 euros and consortium subprojects a maximum of 300,000 euros. The entire consortium is granted a maximum of 1 million euros.
The Research Council may grant two-year funding to selected Academy Project applications if the project concerned is of high quality and promotes scientific renewal and is identified as containing a significant risk for the implementation that affects the funding of the project as such. These risk factors may be, for example, shortcomings in preliminary results supporting the feasibility of research, the introduction of a new research method or challenges related to data collection. The Research Council’s objective is to support innovative projects that would be left unfunded due to this risk, which jeopardises the achievement of the main objectives of the project. The Research Council may consider the quality and innovative nature of such a project to be so significant that it wants to grant two-year funding to reduce the significant risk for the project. This is not a separate funding opportunity to which applications can be submitted, but a choice based on the Research Council’s discretion.
According to Academy policy, a researcher who has ongoing funding for a post as Academy Professor or who is the PI of an ongoing Academy Project will not be granted Academy Project funding. If an applicant is the PI for a consortium subproject in an ongoing Academy Project, they may be granted Academy Project funding only for well-justified reasons. If an applicant has ongoing funding for a post as Academy Research Fellow, they may be granted Academy Project funding for the last two years of the Academy Research Fellowship. By following these Academy policies, the Research Council wants to ensure that it is able to provide funding to as many researchers as possible and across several fields.
Academy Research Fellowships
Primary funding criteria:
- scientific quality and feasibility of the research plan
- applicant’s merits, skills and demonstrations of cooperation networks thus far in relation to the career stage
- the applicant’s must be on a fast career track and show promise, international competitiveness and capacity for renewal; the application shall describe how the project supports the applicant’s increasing competencies and career progress
- the applicant must be in the process of setting up a research team or already have experience of leading a research team.
Secondary funding criteria, applied when deciding between applications of equal merit:
- bold initiatives that promote the renewal of science
- international and national mobility, cooperation of research team
- impact beyond academia
- opportunities to create cooperation networks that support the careers of researchers to be hired, development of the researchers’ own scientific expertise.
Clinical Researcher funding
The primary funding criterion is the scientific quality of the research plan. Additionally, attention is paid to the applicant’s suitability to the objectives of the clinical researcher funding instrument.
The funding for a research post as clinical researcher is a funding opportunity to support part-time research by physicians and other researchers engaged in clinical practice. The patient work must be linked to the research project.
The funding decisions are based on the scientific quality of the research and the applicant’s competence and suitability. The aim is to promote clinical research careers and to encourage healthcare professionals to engage in research alongside clinical practice.
The Research Council’s funding covers a 20–50 per cent salary as well as research costs. A requirement is that clinical practice accounts for at least 50 per cent of the work. The funding period is a maximum of four years.
Those who have received Clinical Researcher funding may have a concurrent Academy Project.
