Structure of research plan: Academy Programme for Development Research (DEVELOP2) 2023

This research plan structure applies to applications in the following funding schemes: Academy Projects, Targeted Academy Projects, Academy Programmes, and sport science research projects funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.

Submit the research plan as a PDF appendix in the Academy’s online services on the tab ‘Research plan’. Read the call text carefully before you start writing the plan. Also, familiarise yourself with the review guidelines and review form.

The research plan must be no more than twelve pages long, unless the call text indicates otherwise. A consortium research plan must be no more than 15 pages long, unless the call text indicates otherwise. The paper size is A4. The font is Source Sans Pro (font size 12 pt, line spacing 1 and margins 20 mm). All references must be added directly into the text, for example as follows: (author(s), year) or [number]. You must not use footnotes. The list of references is part of the research plan and is included in the length of the plan.

The instructions and structure provided must be followed to ensure the equal treatment of applicants. Please use the headings provided. The application cannot be submitted if the system detects an error in the page configuration or the structure.

Fill in the sections of the plan where applicable, according to the practices of your own discipline. Please use the headings provided.

1. Aim and objectives

1.1 Significance of research project in relation to current knowledge, research-based starting points:

  • How the project and the methods used are linked to previous international and/or national research (state of the art)
  • Research premise, aims and objectives

1.2 Research questions and/or hypotheses

1.3 Expected research results and their anticipated scientific impact, potential for scientific breakthroughs and for promoting scientific renewal

  • Research impact within the scientific community
  • Project’s novelty or added value for science

1.4 Special objective of call (concerns Academy Programmes and other thematic calls)

Justifications for how the project will address the call objectives and questions:

  • Why are the selected target country or region and combination of themes important for Finland, that is, what broader impact will the project have there?
  • How are the cross-cutting objectives (gender equality, nondiscrimination and climate resilience) taken into account in the research plan?
  • How does the research project support the goals of the Academy Programme (incl. societal impact) as described in the programme memorandum?

2. Implementation

2.1 Work plan and schedule:

  • Detailed description of the research to be performed, starting from objectives, scientific references and preliminary data (if available)
  • Description of different research tasks, their implementation and interconnections.
  • If necessary, description of the responsibilities and management related to these tasks
  • Schedule for project implementation, incl. research tasks and work packages, distribution of personnel resources, and project milestones and deliverables

2.2 Research data and material, research methods and research environment

  • Research data to be used, justifications and information on data collection or acquisition, data analyses and use of data, taking into account issues such as intellectual property rights
  • Research methods and how they will contribute to answering the research questions or confirming the hypotheses, or how they will support the chosen approach
  • Description of local, national and/or international research environment including research infrastructures. Enter the infrastructures to be used also on the tab ‘Affiliations’ in the online services.

2.3 Risk assessment and alternative implementation strategies

  • Critical points for success, probability of risks, means by which risks can be managed, and alternative implementation strategies

2.4 Added value of consortium (if the application is a consortium application):

3. Applicant, research team and collaborators

3.1 Project personnel and their project-relevant key merits:

  • Task and role of principal investigator (applicant) in the project
  • Tasks and roles of persons working on the project and their key merits
  • Names and/or level of education of the project’s researchers (if known)
  • Project’s links to previous research by the PI or the research team, or to some other research
  • How researcher training will be organised and how research careers will be promoted (applies to Academy Projects, Targeted Academy Projects and Academy Programmes)

3.2 Collaborators:

  • National and international collaborators of key significance to project implementation as well as their roles
  • Justifications for the collaborators, description of what is achieved through the collaboration

4. Responsible science

4.1 Research ethics, equality and nondiscrimination, open science and sustainable development:

Research ethics:

  • Information on ethical issues (e.g. ethical governance procedures, informed consent, anonymity of subjects and withdrawal from research) that concern the chosen topic, methods and data
  • Information on research permits granted or pending
  • Read more in the ethical guidelines.

Equality and nondiscrimination:

Open science:

  • Publication plan that supports open access (Academy-funded projects are required to commit to open access publishing)
  • Read more in the open science guidelines.
  • Brief plan for data management: how the data will be stored during the project, how any legal and ethical issues related to data distribution will be resolved, and where the data will be made available after the end of the project. Funding recipients must submit a full data management plan. The payment of the funding is conditional on the submission of the plan.
  • Read more in the guidelines on the data management plan.

Sustainable development objectives:

5. Societal effects and impact

5.1 Effects and impact beyond academia

  • Brief description of the appeal, utilisation potential and application areas of the research results beyond the scientific community
  • For instance, provide a self-assessment of the expected societal impact of the research in the long or short term. Impact beyond academia may come in many different forms depending on the research field and the project. For example, science is a source of wealth and prosperity, but it also improves our understanding of the world and enhances the level of civilisation, supports the development of good practices and informs decision-making.
  • Read more about the broader impact of research.

6. References

  • List of all the sources used in the research plan.
  • The list of references is part of the research plan and is included in the length of the plan.
  • The text type, font size and line spacing of the list must be the same as elsewhere in the research plan.

Do you have questions or feedback for us?