Arviointikriteerit

• 6 = outstanding, stands out with exceptional novelty, innovativeness and renewal of science at global level
• 5 = excellent, extremely good in international comparison – no significant elements to be improved
• 4 = very good, contains some elements that could be improved
• 3 = good, contains elements that can be improved
• 2 = unsatisfactory, in need of substantial modification or improvement
• 1 = weak, severe flaws that are intrinsic to the proposed project or the application